Western misogyny no match for modern misandry

By Angelo Agathangelou: OK, so I rephrased Bab's title to make my point. I repeat, the central most important issue in this man's life is my children. In this regard, modern misandry in so called first world western society has rendered all men virtually impotent and certainly second class citizens. Therefore I submit for your reading disappointment another diatribe of man hate and belittlement of our raison d'etre by the feminazis. They just don't get it. The life rape of men and their children today.

Misandry no match for misogyny says Barbara Ellen

By Barbara Ellen: I’ve never known a woman carry that chilling aura of compressed perma-rage against the opposite sex that hangs around certain men (Angelo: Because she hasn't the threat of state child abduction and the execution of such by violent force that hangs over us.)

Misandry is hatred of, contempt for, and ingrained prejudice against, men. As a term, it has risen in prominence as a slam-dunk riposte to the term misogyny. These days, every time someone talks about misogyny, they are usually accused of being a misandrist, especially if they are female.

It doesn’t matter if you don’t think you are one, if it’s a simple case of mistaken identity. The first time it happened to me, I didn’t even know what it meant — I had to look it up.
In those days, misogyny was mainstream, misandry was very niche. Now it’s everywhere just about anyone can be called a misandrist, it’s not special anymore. (Angelo: Say it often enough Ellen and you might begin to believe it.)

Those who make it their business to seek out misandry have done a sterling job of “finding” it just about everywhere, and, by doing so, popularising and formalising the concept. “Misandry!” goes the cry every time concerns are raised about, say, domestic violence, parliamentary representation, pay-gaps — all those man-hating classics.

However, while misandry exists, because everything exists, it will always be small fry compared to misogyny. It will never make it into the big leagues. It’s not just that misandry hasn’t got the numbers, it also hasn’t got the rage. (Angelo: Because you live under a rock and can't imagine what it is like to actually be a second class citizen like every father in the west from your position of privilege, e.g. enumerate the government funded men's groups in the UK vs government funded pro-women's organizations and see if I'm wrong you dope. Take my word for it the rage and despair is there in ample measure)

Male rage takes many forms, and one is misogyny. (Angelo: We call it the fight for equality.) It’s not the same as anger from either gender, which comes and goes.

Male rage seems to be as cold and calculated as it is horribly permanent. (Angelo: Goodness Ellen is thick, as if we could ever forget our children, even from the bottom of a bottle. Please note, as Usual in these feminazi essays Ellen would not dare approach the core issue 'fathers rights' that gave birth to the term she is trying to discredit.) While of course women get angry with men, I’ve never known a woman to carry that chilling aura of compressed perma-rage against the opposite sex that hangs around certain men. The relentlessly churning core of hostility, condescension, entitlement and resentment. (Angelo: Ellen clearly hasn't read SGW blog to see some of this BS perma-rage the feminazis are getting up to these days, she must be glued to the lame stream media.)

Only recently a study from the University of Florida said that men are far more likely to secretly want their wives or girlfriends to fail, to be less successful than they are, because it boosts their own sense of self-worth.

It said that men were more likely to feel threatened when their partner succeeded, preferring them to fail, and this remained true in more equal societies such as Holland. By contrast, however well, or otherwise, their partner is doing had no effect on a woman’s self-esteem.

Well, this feels new. The male competitive streak was always presumed to be about the workplace. (Angelo: Right, with 60% and growing of university students being female and like for like statistical comparisons showing the exact opposite to these old regurgitated stats about women's woes.) Now it seems that “dog eat dog” has not only gone inter-gender, it has invaded personal relationships.

What does this mean when increasing numbers of women are the main, if not sole breadwinners? (Angelo: Proves our point.) Could it be affecting those figures of recession-related domestic violence women bearing the brunt of male frustration, when ironically women are often cited as the worst affected by the recession? (Angelo: Because due to your privileges, you are the ones getting the child support. Sort of backfired on you in this case didn't it? Still excellent fuel for you to use against us, eh?) Is this going to be another sign of these hard times; the rise of the threatened perma-enraged male?

Is it even possible to debate this, without the predictable zombie-drone of “misandry”? (Angelo: No Ellen, it's not you raging child raping misandrist.) After all, here is a study about male rage, swirling around women, everywhere, even in their personal lives. How else would you describe these men needing women to fail to make themselves feel better, while curiously women, supposedly such big man-haters, need no such thing? (Angelo: Find me one thing more important than our children, where women have monopolized control and be assured we too would be so secure if the roles were reversed.)

See what I mean about “small fry” — misogyny outguns misandry every time. In this one way, in terms of entrenched cold rage, women are unequal. Pathetically, we can’t even muster up enough bile to resent our partners’ success. (Angelo: If your measure of success is counted in pounds and pence and not by realy important issues like equality with regards to our children, Ellen.) Those who cling to “misandry” as if it were the sex war’s holy grail are going to have to face it — women just aren’t up to the task of hating men as much, as imaginatively and as permanently as some of them hate us. (Angelo: As long as woman outrank men with regards to their children, sure, I agree with you there.)

Source 

Angelo: Now do the misandrists get it? Oh please, please, get it, Barbara Ellen!

Related Additional: Willie Lynch letter: The Making of a Slave